Earn $$ with WidgetBucks!

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Rosli Khamis (Loloq) Dies

Award-winning songwriter Rosli Khamis, better known as Loloq, died at the Damansara Specialist Hospital here on Wednesday, following an operation on Monday to remove a blood clot in his brain.

Loloq, 50, frequently collaborated with singer, songwriter and composer M. Nasir.

Among Loloq's famous songs are Andalusia and Bonda (performed by M. Nasir), Aladin and Cinta Dewa Dewi (Spider), Dewi (Hattan), Awan Yang Terpilu (Ning Baizura), Nafas Cinta (Misha Omar), and Angan dan Sedar (Mawi).

Loloq also composed the song Demi Semangat Kesukanan which was sung by Lynn Ali for the 2001 SEA Games in Kuala Lumpur.

The Singapore-born songwriter also acted in films such as Zombi Kampung Pisang, Embun, Senario Lang Buana and Man Laksa. Apart from writing the script for the films Orang Minyak and the soon-to-be-filmed Aduh Saliha he was also a judge and critic on reality TV shows Bintang Kecil and Akademi Fantasia.

Loloq is survived by wife Hariah Yaacob and three children - Krsty Nur, 11, Jaevn Nur, 8 dan Yasha Nur, 6.

He was buried Wednesday at the Muslim cemetery in Bandar Baru Sungai Buloh.

Missing Leads of Linggam Video Inquiry

KUALA LUMPUR: The Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) investigator in charge of the video clip case admitted she did not investigate many potential angles although leads were apparent from the testimony of witnesses and from the clip itself.

Senior Superintendent Chuah Lay Choo made the admission under the barrage of information put to her by lawyers acting for several witnesses of the inquiry and the Malaysian Bar.

As she was being “grilled” on the methodology that she had employed when conducting her investigation, the 52-year-old started to stutter.

Speaking in a faltering voice, she hesitantly acknowledged the obvious leads that she did not follow.

Her persistent replies that her scope of investigations was only confined to “the appointment of Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim as Court of Appeal president and Chief Justice” drew irksome reactions from those in the public gallery.

To questions by Americk Sidhu, counsel for businessman Loh Mui Fah, Chuah said she was instructed to investigate the case at the end of September last year.

She said her team recorded the statements of Lingam, tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan, Tourism Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor and former Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim.

Asked how she picked out Loh, when there are 26 million Malaysians, Chuah said: “From our investigations, we found that he was the person in the second portion of the video clip.
Americk: Who pointed this out?

Chuah: It was through our investigations.

Commission chairman Tan Sri Haidar Mohd Noor: Ya, but who?

Chuah: It was from an interview with Datuk V.K. Lingam.

Haidar: He told the ACA?

Chuah: Yes.

Haidar: Just say so lah. Don’t hide.

Americk: When V.K. Lingam identified Loh Mui Fah as the person in the clip, did he identify himself as well?

Chuah: No, he didn’t. He said it appears like him and sounds like him.

Americk: Once he identified Loh Mui Fah, did he give his particulars? That’s how you traced him (to Malacca)?

Chuah: Yes.

She also said her team found out that Lingam was in Britain when the video clip was first made public and that the ACA only got the phone numbers of Lingam, Tan, Tengku Adnan and Ahmad Fairuz as stated in their statements. However, she admitted that she did not ask them to volunteer the numbers they had in 2000 and 2001.

Asked if she had tried to find out what Lingam’s phone number was in his house in Britain, Chuah replied that her team tried but failed.

Americk then asked her if it would assist her investigations if he gave the number to her.

“It would not be useful now. I don’t think so,” she replied.

Americk: If you were to obtain the mobile and fixed lines of the other key players, would you be able to retrieve their records from September to December?

Chuah: We may be able to.

Americk: Once you have all these records, would it be possible to find out whether any calls were made between any of these numbers from September to December?

Chuah: I believe so.

To questions by counsel Christopher Leong, who is acting for the Malaysian Bar, she said she was aware of the investigations carried out by ACA in 1998 in relation to allegations made by Lingam’s brother V. Thirunama Karasu.

She, however, did not investigate because her investigations were confined to the appointment of Tun Ahmad Fairuz.

Later questioned by Ranjit Singh, another counsel for the Bar, Chuah said she did not check the telephone records of prominent figures mentioned in the clip because to her the relevant period meant the day the clip was filmed.

Ranjit: But you said you did not know the date.

Chuah: Errr, we were told it was in 2002.

Ranjit: Who told?

Chuah: When the clip was handed we were told it was 2002.

Ranjit: My suggestion is that the material time will be around the time this video was recorded, before and soon after that.

Chuah: At that time, it did not occur to me.

Ranjit: In the transcript of the clip there are references to phone calls and discussions, for example, between Lingam and Tengku Adnan. Don’t you think this is relevant?

Chuah: At that time, we were trying to establish when the conversation occurred. We were trying to get closer to the period. We haven’t even confirmed the date of that call yet.

Ranjit: Now do you think it is relevant? It does appear quite improper for a lawyer to be brokering appointment of judges?

Chuah: It is irrelevant but we have direct interview with the witness concerned.

Ranjit: As the investigating officer, you know you will be facing potential criminals and after you interviewed you verify the facts because not all of them are going to tell the truth?

Chuah: Yes.

Ranjit: This wasn’t done in this case?

Chuah: No.

Ranjit: I suggest that neither you nor the ACA have done a thorough investigation on the contents of this video.

Chuah: I think we have tried to establish the truth.

Ranjit Singh then proceeded to ask Chuah whether she investigated a 25-minute call made from Lingam’s house to a Singapore registered number – 02-98766505 – on the day the clip was recorded.

Chuah admitted that she did not do so.

Ranjit: Wouldn’t it be relevant? Did you not follow up?

Chuah: No.

Ranjit: Did you find out if Tun Ahmad Fairuz was in Singapore in December 2001?

Chuah: No.

Ranjit: Did you not think it was pertinent?

Chuah: As I understand, in the video clip it was an incoming call.

Ranjit: That was what a witness said. It may not be the real position. The fact that you went through Lingam’s house phone records suggests that you suspected that the call could have been made from there. Would it not be pertinent to check if Tun Ahmad Fairuz was in Singapore?

Chuah: Yes.

Ranjit: From another phone in the same house, there was another 28-minute call to Singapore on the same number at 9.46pm. Is it not pertinent to check that too?

Chuah: Yes.

Ranjit: If Tun Ahmad Fairuz had used a prepaid number in 2001, you also wouldn’t be able to check?

Chuah: Yes.

Ranjit: So, this list (referring to Ahmad Fairuz’ fixed lines records) does not confirm conclusively whether Tun Ahmad Fairuz made a call to V.K. Lingam in late December 2001?

Chuah:
(Silent)

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

The New Era of Sabah

KOTA KINABALU: A total of RM105bil in investments, 900,000 jobs, a waterfront city, tourism projects and a RM600mil new Sabah Railway terminal – these are among the things Sabahans will get when the Sabah Development Corridor (SDC) is completed in 18 years.

In addition, Gross Domestic Product will be up to RM63bil and an annual per capita income will hit RM14,800.

As an immediate measure, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi announced an extra RM5bil allocation under the Ninth Malaysia Plan to improve infrastructure and to reduce the cost of doing business in the state.

And minutes after Abdullah launched the SDC, 13 MoUs were signed involving international companies from China, the United States and Japan for various projects worth RM16bil.

These developments include housing, condominiums, hotels, the waterfront city, ports, tourism projects and the railway terminal at Tanjung Aru.

The Prime Minister said the SDC was to transform Sabah into an environmentally conscious and modern state and gave an assurance that every aspect of the corridor development would benefit all Sabahans.

“Today we see the Land Below the Wind take a quantum leap to be developed and be prosperous,” he said to applause from the crowd at Sapangar Container Port here yesterday.
He outlined five key thrusts of the SDC, which will be to:

* Make Sabah the gateway for trade, investment and tourism in the region.

* Transform the state into a harmonious and prosperous state regardless of race or religion.

* Make the state more technology-savvy to ensure a better quality of life.

* Provide job opportunities in the state.

* Make Sabah a comfortable state to live in with good quality of life accentuated with diverse cultures, heritage and environment.

Abdullah said that with the realisation of the five key aspects, the face of Sabah would be totally changed under the plans which would not leave out any group or region in the state.

“This is not a daydream. We are not making an empty promise. There is no doubt there is a lot of challenges but we will ensure that the Sabah corridor will be a success,” he said.

Under the SDC, the state’s west coast would see an industrial sub-corridor and agro-food industry for small and medium enterprises. For the central and northern zones, there will be an agripolitan zone, tourism, highland agriculture and agro-forestry.

The east coast will have industries, marine tourism, integrated agro food industry, agro-biotechnology, and palm oil-based industry zones.

Abdullah said that the overall focus of the SDC was to promote Sabah’s inherent strengths that included its location, rich natural resources as well as cultural and biological diversity that can become high potential economic activity.

The sectors being promoted would be agriculture, tourism and logistics, services and manufacturing, he said.

He said they also hoped to bring in more tourists to the state by developing eco-tourism destinations like Sipadan, Danum Valley and Darvel Bay.

Abdullah said the federal government would liberalise the open skies policy for air travel to Sabah.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Tun Ahmad Fairuz: I did not call Linggam

KUALA LUMPUR: Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim had neither called nor given his telephone number to lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam, tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan nor Tourism Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor.

The former Chief Justice also told the Royal Commission of Inquiry he could not positively identify the person in the video clip as Lingam as he claimed that he did not know the lawyer that well.

Below are the excerpts of Ahmad Fairuz's 80-minute testimony as the 14th witness of the inquiry.

Leading officer DPP Datuk Azmi Ariffin: Throughout the time before and after you held the post of Chief Judge of Malaya, did you know a lawyer by the name of Datuk V.K. Lingam?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes, I knew him.

Azmi: How would you describe your relationship with him?

Ahmad Fairuz: I only knew him as a lawyer.

Azmi: Do you know Tan Sri Vincent Tan?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes, I do.

Azmi: How would you describe your relationship with him?

Ahmad Fairuz: I only meet him at official functions at the state and national levels.

Azmi: Do you know Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes.

Azmi: How would you describe your relationship with Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan?

Ahmad Fairuz: I only see him at official government events.

Azmi: Regarding this inquiry, which has a video clip as the subject matter, do you know of a clip allegedly showing a lawyer brokering the appointment of judges?

Ahmad Fairuz: My former secretary drew my attention to this video clip on her computer. It was shown to me but it was not clear and it kept “breaking”.

Azmi: After seeing it, do you have an idea who the person in the video clip is?

Ahmad Fairuz: I can't identify the person positively because my relationship with Datuk V.K. Lingam is only that of a lawyer (and a judge). So I can't identify him positively.

Azmi: Do you know the subject of the conversation in the video clip?

Ahmad Fairuz: Because the video clip kept breaking, I couldn't make out the content of the phone conversation.

Azmi: If I play the video clip, would you be able to remember?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes.

The 14-minute video clip was then played.

Azmi: Can you identify the Indian man speaking on the phone who then speaks to a Chinese man after that?

Ahmad Fairuz: I can't positively identify him because I've only met him once or twice in court and at the Prime Minister's residence when I visited the Prime Minister's wife.

Azmi: Does the person's face and voice resemble Datuk V.K. Lingam?

Ahmad Fairuz: There are resemblances.

Azmi: According to a previous witness, this video was recorded on Dec 20, 2001. Did you call Datuk V.K. Lingam on Dec 20, 2001 to confirm your position as President of the Court of Appeal?

Ahmad Fairuz: No.

Azmi: Have you ever had a meeting with Datuk V.K. Lingam, Tan Sri Vincent Tan and Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan to secure your appointment as the President of the Court of Appeal and subsequently, as Chief Justice?

Ahmad Fairuz: Never.

Azmi: Have you ever sought the help of Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan and Tan Sri Vincent Tan through Datuk V.K. Lingam to confirm your position as the President of the Court of Appeal?

Ahmad Fairuz: Never.

Azmi: Had there ever been a plan or a pact between you, Datuk V.K. Lingam, Tan Sri Vincent Tan and Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan to ensure your appointment as President of the Court of Appeal and Chief Justice at any time?

Ahmad Fairuz: Never.

Azmi: (Referring to the portion of the transcript where the Indian man said he was speaking to the Chief Judge of Malaya “Datuk Ahmad Fairuz”) On Dec 20, 2001, you were the Chief Judge of Malaya?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes.

Azmi: When the Indian man said “Ahmad Fairuz”, he was referring to you?

Ahmad Fairuz: At that time, Datuk Ahmad Fairuz was the Chief Judge of Malaya.

Azmi: When the Indian man said you were the next Chief Justice, were you subsequently appointed as the Chief Justice?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes.

Azmi: (On the phrase “He is Eusoff Chin's man” from the transcript) In the context of this conversation, was the Indian man referring to “Datuk Ahmad Fairuz” when he said “he”?

Ahmad Fairuz: In this context, yes.

Azmi: (On the portion of the transcript where the Indian man said Dzaiddin's recommendation of Tan Sri Abdul Malek Ahmad as Chief Judge of Malaya was rejected because the latter was “anti-PM”) Do you know if Tun Dzaiddin ever made such a proposal?

Ahmad Fairuz: I didn't know.

Azmi: Was the statement made by the Indian man true in that you were appointed as the Chief Judge of Malaya after Tan Sri Abdul Malek was rejected because he was “anti-PM”?

Ahmad Fairuz: I don't know.

Azmi: (On the portion in the transcript where the Indian man said “Datuk Ahmad Fairuz” rang him to thank him following his appointment as Chief Judge of Malaya)

Have you ever called Datuk V.K. Lingam to thank him for his efforts in securing your position as stated in this context?

Ahmad Fairuz: Never.

After the leading officer finished his questions, the former Chief Justice's counsel Salehuddin Saidin started his examination.

Salehuddin: The first time you were shown the clip, did you see anything else?

Ahmad Fairuz: In the afternoon, my secretary gave me two documents from Malaysiakini – one was an article with the heading “Video Links Chief Justice To Judge-Fixing Scandal” and the other a “Transcript of V.K. Lingam's Conversation with Ahmad Fairuz.”

Salehuddin: When you saw all these, what was your reaction?

Ahmad Fairuz: I immediately thought that this was slander (fitnah). Two things crossed my mind – it might be fabrication or the person speaking in the video might be trying to impress some people when the video was recorded.

Salehuddin: Did you take any action after getting the articles?

Ahmad Fairuz: I read both of them over and over again.

The next day, I drafted a letter to the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz) to explain my opinion and position on the video.

Salehuddin: What was your relationship like with Tun Eusoff Chin?

Ahmad Fairuz: He was my chief, I was a judge.

Salehuddin: (Referring to the portion of the transcript about a memo on the appointment of judges) Have you ever prepared a memo with the person said to be Datuk V.K. Lingam?

Ahmad Fairuz: Never.

Salehuddin: Do you know Wee Choo Keong?

Ahmad Fairuz: He is a lawyer and I've heard his case before in 1995, that's all. I've also seen him at official functions.

Salehuddin: When you were a High Court judge, you heard the election petition involving Wee in 1995?

Ahmad Fairuz: Yes.

Salehuddin: Who appointed you as the election judge?

Ahmad Fairuz: As far as I know, the Chief Judge of Malaya appointed election judges.

Salehuddin: Who was the Chief Judge of Malaya then?

Ahmad Fairuz: Tan Sri Anuar (Zainal Abidin) if I recall correctly.

Salehuddin: So Tan Sri Anuar appointed you to hear the petition?

Ahmad Fairuz: If I'm not mistaken, yes.

Salehuddin: (Referring to the transcript) Were you the man talking to the Indian man in the video at that time?

Ahmad Fairuz: No.

Salehuddin: So him claiming it was “Ahmad Fairuz” is not true?

Ahmad Fairuz: It's not true.

Salehuddin: Since you denied all the facts from the transcript, do you have any idea why this Indian man said to be Datuk V.K. Lingam implicated you as the person he was speaking to?

Ahmad Fairuz: I don't know. I don't know why he did such a thing.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Samy Vellu: Mind your own business

SEREMBAN: The MIC has reminded other Barisan Nasional component parties to stay out of the Indian community's affairs.

Its president, Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu, said there were some BN component party leaders who had been meeting the Indian community and trying to get it to voice its problems.

"They are trying to stir the pot. Let the MIC worry about the Indian community. The other parties should concentrate on helping their own communities," he said without naming the parties.While the 14 BN component members are dominated by a particular race, the People's Progressive Party and Gerakan have a strong Indian voice.

Samy Vellu was speaking after attending the Tafe College convocation ceremony here yesterday. Present were MIC vice-presidents Tan Sri K.S. Nijhar and Datuk S. Vee-rasingam and state MIC chief Datuk T. Rajagopalu.

Samy Vellu also said that the MIC was confident of winning all the seats it would contest in the next general election despite the current unhappiness among the Indian community.

"MIC has a very good record in the general election and I am confident that the Indian community will continue to support BN." He said that only a small segment of the community was dissatisfied and behind demonstrations and protests.

He also said the party would name more women candidates in the general election.

"We have always given opportunities for our women members. We now have a woman parliamentary secretary and women state executive council members." He also blasted the opposition for disrespecting a Hindu temple in Ipoh by lighting candles inside the temple during Thaipusam while protesting against the detention of Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) leaders under the Internal Security Act.

In Kuala Lumpur, Samy Vellu demanded that opposition leader Lim Kit Siang apologise to the Indian community for asking the people to light candles in a temple.

"Hindus never hold vigils in a temple. It is against our beliefs. Kit Siang does not know anything about the religion, so he shouldn't ask people to do things against the faith."

Pak Suharto

32 YEARS OF RULE WITH AN IRON FIST: Allies and critics of former president Suharto, who died yesterday aged 86, agree that his legacy still looms large in Indonesia's political, economic and cultural life. Suharto's autocratic rule, over more than three decades, was marked by rampant corruption, cronyiam and widespread human abuses.

MOHAMMED Suharto, the son of poor peasants, rose to lead the world's most populous Muslim nation for 32 years and turned the backward Asian nation into a tiger economy.A man of few words, Suharto was complex and charismatic, and both reviled and loved by the people. He is remembered as the father of development by some and a butcher by others."I like Suharto very much," said Sumirah, a domestic helper from Tegal, central Java. "When he was president, life was easy. There was always enough to eat, basic commodities were cheap. "Now life is very, very hard."

Even as he brought development to Indonesia, Suharto also presided over some of the worst atrocities in modern Indonesian history.He ruled the vast archipelago of 17,000 islands with an iron fist. Dissent was brutally crushed by the military.Unlike his predecessor, Indonesia's founding father Sukarno, who united the country through patriotism and oratory, Suharto held Indonesia's disparate religious, ethnic and social groups together by sheer force."The meanest and cruellest dictator is the one who can smile while his hands are covered in blood," said journalist Rudy Madanir.

Suharto seized power from Sukarno during the 1960s against the backdrop of the Cold War. Fate presented Suharto with the opportunity to change the course of Indonesian history on Sept 30, 1965, when six generals and a lieutenant were kidnapped and killed by a group of leftist officers.Suharto, then a two-star general and head of the strategic army reserve Kostrad, was tasked with putting down the coup attempt and prosecuting the perpetrators.When news came that army commander Ahmad Yani was among those killed, Suharto took control of the army. It blamed the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) for plotting and carrying out the coup.Thus began a violent bloodbath to purge the country of communists.

The army, on Suharto's orders, embarked on a campaign to incite the people to attack communist party members, the country's tiny ethnic Chinese community and Sukarno loyalists.Hundreds of thousands of PKI members and ethnic Chinese were hunted down and slaughtered. Real and suspected PKI members were taken away from their homes by local vigilantes and army units and killed by knife or bayonet.

Estimates of the death toll number from 100,000 to more than a million. It was one of the worst massacres of the 20th century.Suharto moved swiftly to consolidate his hold over the armed forces, purging it of Sukarno loyalists and communist sympathisers.In March 1967, Suharto was formally named acting president, and a year later, president.Suharto's rise to power took many by surprise. He was an unknown army general who had displayed little interest in politics.

The force of Suharto's willpower can be traced back to his poverty-stricken and difficult childhood. He was born into a family of poor peasants on June 8, 1921 in Kemusuk village near the royal city of Yogyakarta, Central Java, during the Dutch colonial era.His parents' marriage broke up before he turned 2. He was brought up by each of his remarried parents and relatives in different villages at various times, and knew no stability in his young life.

The hardship of his childhood and youth shaped his character.As the leader of Southeast Asia's largest country, he set out to rebuild Indonesia's shattered economy by appointing a group of Western-trained economists.Suharto reined in the country's inflation, stabilised the rupiah and attracted foreign direct investment, which created jobs and raised the standard of living for millions of poor people.

Throughout his rule, Suharto rarely spoke in public but smiled very often and earned himself the nickname "the Smiling General".He left it to his generals and ministers to make public announcements. The distance added to his enigma and princely persona, which inspired fear, admiration and loyalty among the people.It was only in the company of peasants, the people who toiled the land with their hands, that Suharto felt at home.

The agricultural community, numbering in the millions, held a special place in Suharto's heart. He paid close attention to their needs, which in turn earned him their loyalty.But among many Indonesians, Suharto was reviled for his human rights abuses and the corruption, cronyism and nepotism involving his children, family and friends.

Indonesia's invasion of Timor Leste and annexation in 1975 resulted in the death of some 200,000 people at the hands of the armed forces. Military operations in the restive province of Aceh also claimed thousands of lives.In 1998, when the Asian economic crisis hit Indonesia, the rupiah lost almost 80 per cent of its value. Overnight, millions were thrown out of work and languished below the poverty line.Amid widespread civil unrest, Suharto resigned on May 21, 1998. He subsequently lived a quiet life in the leafy suburb of Menteng in central Jakarta, and was rarely seen in public.

Critics and anti-corruption campaigners accused Suharto's family of amassing US$45 billion (RM148.5 billion) in kickbacks or deals during his time in office. His family have denied such charges.Last year, state prosecutors filed a civil suit claiming US$440 million in state funds and a further US$1 billion in damages for alleged misuse of money held by one of Suharto's charity foundations.Right till the end, Suharto remained an ambiguous, controversial figure.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Suharto Dies

JAKARTA (Indonesia): Former Indonesian president Suharto, an army general who crushed Indonesia's communist movement and pushed aside the country's founding father to usher in 32 years of tough rule that saw up to a million political opponents killed, died Sunday. He was 86.

"He has died,'' Dr Christian Johannes told The Associated Press, adding that he died at 1.10pm (2.10pm Malaysian time).

Dozens of doctors on Suharto's medical team had been rushed to the Pertamina Hospital in the capital, Jakarta, after his blood pressure fell suddenly Saturday night.

Suharto had slipped out of consciousness for the first time in more than three weeks of treatment, doctors said.

Suharto, had been in intensive care with lung, heart and kidney failure since he was admitted to the hospital on Jan 4.

Over the past week his physicians had spoken of a recovery, but by Sunday that had changed dramatically. - AP